TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Web media From:"Anthony Markatos" <tonymar -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com, tonymar -at- hotmail -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:34:40 PST
Tony Markatos responds:
....In any communications project - paper-based or web - the main thing
that needs to be done is to obtain a rigorous understanding of the
end-user's goals. Yourdon & Associates state that this is ninty-eight
percent (98%) if the REQUIRED work.
Andrew Plato responds:
The web is a media outlet, like television. Therefore building sites is a
complex media and development process - not purely a writing task.
Tony Markatos responds:
If you are saying that web surfers are, like TV "channel-surfers", often not
very goal driven, I can see this. However, web site organization is still
very important; you can not just randomly position stuff. And the only
truely effective way to organize (partition) is by end-user goals.
About Writing: Andrew, VERY few people mistake me to be 'gun-ho' for
writing. The simple truth is that for technical communications - even
paper-based - writen text is a very poor tool for documenting procedural
information. If you want to say that writen text is also a poor chose for
communicating non-procedural information, (web or otherwise) you won't get
any argument from me.
Andrew Plato said:
You can whine all you want about how the site must cater to the needs of the
user, but if you can't grasp the architectural aspects of how the site does
this - they you cannot exploit that technology to
meet your oh so dear end-user needs.
Tony Markatos responds:
Ask yourself, which of the following is more "real world":
Company A: A very rigorous analysis was performed on the product's (web
site's) end-users. And, based upon this analysis, the product's interface
was designed to be very user friendly. However, the development effort fell
apart because we simply could not find enough "techies" to implement the
design.
Company B: We have enough "techies" - everybody here is a techie. But
nobody really knows (or cares to know) the end-user. As a result, the web
site is a failure because it does not meet the user's needs and is too hard
to understand.
Tony Markatos
(tonymar -at- hotmail -dot- com)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com