TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FW: In search of a term From:"EXT-Hornoi-Centerwall, Theodore" <Theodore -dot- Hornoi-Centerwall -at- PSS -dot- Boeing -dot- com> To:"'TECHWR-L'" <TECHWR-L -at- LISTS -dot- RAYCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:39:18 -0800
The words "operations" and "operational" comes to mind. It carries the connotation
of being business-like and covering an extended area. Think of the phrase
"field of operations" or the title "Operational Project Manager".
Hope this helps.
<snipped>
> We have three levels of information included in our documentation:
> Product level (the most general level)
> *something* level (the intermediate level)
> Module level (the detailed level)
>
> The terms "product" and "module" are set at this point (we have a May 1
> release date), and cannot be changed. However, we need a name for the
> intermediate level of information. Two ideas thus far have been "Functional
> Area" and "Subject Area", but I'm not too thrilled with either of those.
>
<snipped>