TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Granularity means hierarchy in the software company that I work for.
Example: What level of granularity are you talking about? = What level of
hierarchy are you talking about?
Lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Heath" <rheath -at- eGain -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 2:00 PM
Subject: "Granularity"?
> The engineer who wrote the feature specs for an application I'm
documenting
> used the word "granularity" in a sense I'm not familiar with. The
> application uses queues to keep track of customers needing help from
> customer service reps. Here's the table he wrote:
>
> Queues No Granularity Medium Granularity High Granularity
> A A A A
> B B B B
> C C C C
> D D D D
> Voice over IP Voice over IP Voice over IP
> for A, B, C, D for A for A
> Voice over IP Voice over IP
> for C for B
> Voice over
> IP
> for C
> Voice over
> IP
> for D
>
> In a nutshell, I suppose he means to say that one can add a special Voice
> over IP queue for any of the existing queues in the application.
However,I'm
> not sure he has used the correct word. When I searched on "granularity" at
> britannica.com, among the references to rocks and photography I found an
> article from InfoWorld magazine in which this sentence appeared:
>
> "Network management vendors have heard the cries of administrators who
want
> more granularity in their traffic monitoring and analysis solutions"
>
> Is this term accepted in computer science or elsewhere in the technology
> industry, or is it just jargon that is being used in place of a more
precise
> term?
>
> Baffled,
> Robert