TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I don't know that I've ever seen a piece of technical writing
> and said to myself, "There's a classic example of work that only a Senior
> Technical Writer could have produced," or "Here's work obviously done
> by a junior TW."
> There have been books that I thought were well done, and books that I
thought
> could have been done better. The same goes for web sites or online
> help.
I agree, but I'd expand that. I think the senior tech writer designation has
more to do with having a shorter expected turnaround time, being able to
design and implement a project from beginning to end, and requiring less
editorial/structural input.
That is, the same piece of work can be produced by a senior and a junior
technical writer, but in a just world, the junior tech writer would have
gotten some direction and help on the structure, design, project schedules,
format, and so forth; while the senior tech writer would have done all that
without the same degree of help.
Over the span of my career, I suppose my writing skills have improved a
little, but my project management, social engineering, information design,
and technology skills have all improved enormously. Technical writing skills
are fairly finite, too. They are a tiny subset of writing skills overall.
They're not universal or anything, but they are something that even a junior
writer should be at at least 80% proficient in. The differentiating skills
are more along the lines of structuring, designing, organizing, and quickly,
effectively grasping relevant technologies.
> Often the title of Senior Technical Writer denotes a pay
> grade or rate. Not infrequently having this title inflicted on one is a
sign of
> experience in the field. Experience seems to be what separates the Senior
> TW from the title of Technical Writer, but it is equally true that if one
> is being hired at a given salary one may have to take the title of Senior
> because that's the title for that Job Grade, experience having little to
do with
> it.
On the other side of that argument, 'junior' and 'senior' levels often
indicate, essentially, that seniors get hitsies. Consequently, a lot of
smaller companies won't see the need to indicate levels of technical
writers. I have had well-paying, senior level positions where my title
didn't have a senior prepended to it, only because there weren't any juniors
there for me to push around.
And it never occurred to me to be bothered by that until I put it on my
resume. I'll try to remember that next time, though.