RE: Microsoft Manual of Style

Subject: RE: Microsoft Manual of Style
From: John Wilcox <jwilcox -at- tcsi -dot- com>
To: "List, Techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:20:07 -0700

Darren Barefoot wrote:

> I referred to the second
>edition MS Manual of Style, published in 1998, which offers the following
>advice under CD:
>
>"It is acceptable to use the abbreviation CD alone if there's no possibility
>of confusion with other compact disks, such as CD-R (recordable)."

Glad to see they've come around. Didn't know there was a newer edition.

>Obviously, the MS Manual of Style is not the be-all, end-all of
>decision-makers, but we make Windows software, so we adhere to it.

I don't see the logic in that. If the software gets ported to Linux, will you
wait for a Linux style guide before updating the docs? We make software that
runs on Solaris, but we don't necessarily adhere to Sun's style guide (not that
I have anything against it). It's your company's software -- why adhere to
another company's style guide?

--
Regards,

John Wilcox - Senior Technical Writer, TCSI Corp., Bothell, Washington USA
Sometimes you gotta create what you want to be a part of. -- Geri Weitzman




Previous by Author: Re: Maybe We (Don't) Need a New Job Title
Next by Author: trusting one's sources
Previous by Thread: Graphics conflict between Word 2000 and Frame 5.5.6
Next by Thread: RE: Microsoft Manual of Style


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads