RE: Vote early and often

Subject: RE: Vote early and often
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 16:25:47 -0400

Hallo:

However, Word does have a decent HTML and XML output filter, right? That can
only get better. How many tech writers really *need* SGML, outside of those
writing for the federal government? I don't expect any increased SGML use to
really affect Word, if the continuous history of product instability hasn't.
The positives , VBA, ubiquity, foreign-GUI translation, and strength of the
manufacturer are not likely to go away soon (despite the DOJ).

Best regards,

Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com

(An avid FrameMaker user.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zdunczyk, Ann Eleanor (Ann) [SMTP:zdunczyk -at- lucent -dot- com]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 4:21 PM
> To: TECHWR-L; 'Brierley, Sean'
> Subject: RE: Vote early and often
>
> I would not jump to any conclusions. SGML is coming on strong. We use
> FrameMaker +SGML and ArborText. We have some people that are holding out
> with Word but not as mean as you might think.
> Thanks
> Z
>
(Good night <g>.)




Previous by Author: RE: Vote early and often
Next by Author: Translators--who?
Previous by Thread: RE: Vote early and often
Next by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Polls


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads