TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
John Posada wrote:
In the publication WEBtechniques (a CMP publication), there is a
quote by the Executive Editor:
"Fortunately, developers aren't required to understand the
nuances of English. They're sought after for their knowledge of
other languages, like Java and Perl..."
Just something to think about.
~~~~~~~
Thank you John - something I was thinking about this week dovetails with
your Friday thought...
I once interviewed for a technical writer position at a small company of
about 300 employees. The job description listed "Minimum of 1 year of C++
programming experience working from design documents"
Okay - no problem, thinketh me. Competent tech writers who have successfully
taken C++ courses, written from design specs and understand high level
programming concepts should apply -- right???
- Wrong -
The company asked me to speak with the Development Manager. After a few
minutes, we both realized his need for a developer outweighed my need for a
job. Later, I asked the HR representative who arranged the interview to
follow the lead of Microsoft. At that company, there is a clear distinction
between Technical Writers/Communicators and Programmer/Writers.
One side note - A developer in this hot market may decide to become a
technical writer. However, it wouldn't be for the money. There may be a few
writers on this list who bill at the same rate as developers -- I've read
the boastings and am happy for them.