TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Orlando Conference and Exhibits (ramble) From:Glen Warner <gdwarner -at- ricochet -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sun, 4 Jun 2000 03:48:18 -0700
Marilynne Smith (marilyns -at- qualcomm -dot- com) wrote:
(*snip*)
> I would advise all speakers to use a mike. Even those whose voices
project
> well, still can't be heard from the back. When a speaker announces
he or
> she will not be using the mike because they speak loud enough, I
> groan. About 3/4 of these people do not speak loudly.
I really hate it when a speaker *with* a mike takes questions from
someone in the front row who whispers and then just answers the
question -- without repeating the question for the benefit of everyone
outside of the vicinity of the whispering questioner.
During our (Seattle's) big WTO event, I had the pleasure of
transcribing the WTO press conferences from audio tape. Question and
answer time came: couldn't hear a single question. In those
instances, the transcript read like so:
AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Indecipherable)
SPEAKER: No. Next question?
Note that the "indecipherable" part was a very long question in most
instances.
Something to keep in mind during your presentations!
--gdw
> Marilynne Smith
> Sr. Technical Writer
> QUALCOMM
>