TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
Subject:RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy? From:"Halter, Meg" <HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:14:13 -0700
Ahem. I should explain that I'm in California and I was spoofing
semi-literate valley-speak that is so common around here. Really. I should
have put a smiley at the end of the sentence.
-- Meg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Halter, Meg [SMTP:HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil]
>
> That's, like, you know, like, so totally true.
>
> -- Meg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amram Hakohen [SMTP:amramh -at- dnrc -dot- bell-labs -dot- com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 1:55 AM
> > To: TECHWR-L
> > Cc: TECHWR-L
> > Subject: Re: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
> >
> > And what about
> >
> > imminent
> > eminent
> > immanent
> >
> > Lord knw that most American's haven't got a clue as to the difference
> > in meaning or pronunciation (esp. in California).
>
