TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I once worked for a major department store which was the victim of a
hostile takeover
(read VERY hostile; this was a Jewish company taken over by
anti-Semites). The new owners wanted to have the company publicly traded,
and then sell it for a hefty profit. Accordingly, their only goals were
VERY short-term.
Apart from the quality of employees hired because of their race and
religion, these people were promised *HUGE* bonuses if they delivered
certain systems by specific dates. Never mind if it crashed the following
morning -- all that was needed was delivery by a certain time. Developers
were specifically told that "We don't have time to test", and it was made
abundantly clear that the only goal was that of implementing certain
systems by a given date.
Most of these developers were consultants. There was one tech writer, a
very nice, bright guy fresh out of college who knew nothing about computers
and had never written anything before.
Just in case I ever again find myself in this situation, what would you do
if you were
a consultant specifically directed to do things you knew were totally
wrong? In other words, would you knowingly sabotage a system just to
ensure that your boss would get his humungous bonus? Would you
leave? Would you insist upon some modicum of professionalism?