TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
You've missed the point entirely. Neither Plato, Michele Davis, me or
anyone else are anti-process, in fact we understand and utilize standards,
procedures and guidelines to do our jobs. I myself have said so in at least
three messages on this thread, and Andrew has said it at least once. We are
saying the process in itself is not a goal, and putting process above
content (or should I say obsessing over process) is not merely useless, it's
counter-productive. Creativity is a completely different issue entirely.
Politely asking you to please blow your smoke in another direction
Connie Giordano
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Emory [mailto:danemory -at- primenet -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:54 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Structure vs Substance?
At 01:28 PM 6/13/00 -0400, SteveFJong -at- aol -dot- com wrote:
>But can process
>help? I think so, if the whole organization buys in to them.
=====================================================
Your statement reminded me of something I already knew, but failed to
dredge up as the ultimate response to those like Plato who think
structure, process, and standards are often counterproductive.
I doubt if any of those anti-process folks would grant that same freedom
from
restrictive processes to other departments of the company in which they
work,
particularly the engineering groups upon which they rely for the information
they require. So, as I suggested in the post which started this thread,
anti-process folks want to be able to blow smoke up their own ass (as well
as everyone else's) without a reciprocal smoke-blowing entitlement granted
to the other departments. They think they're entitled to some kind of
plenary
indulgence that liberates them from the restrictive processes imposed on
others,
because "writing is so much more creative than anything else done in my
company."
The chef in the cafeteria probably feels the same way. But suppose the chef
also decides to transcend policies and processes so as to unfetter his
creative
juices. If the result is that the food is not ready at the appointed
time, it will be the anti-process folks who'll scream the loudest,
demanding that
the chef must submit to discipline and process, and his creative urges will
have
to suffer if it means they don't get to eat on time.
====================
| Nullius in Verba |
====================
Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates
FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory -at- primenet -dot- com
10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646
---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to
majordomo -at- omsys -dot- com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.
