TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
-----Original Message-----
>Laurie Little wrote:
>> The writer uses a partial sentence to introduce a list, then treats each
>> bullet/step as a continuance of this sentence; i.e. each starts with
>> lowercase.
>And Dick Margulis responds:
>Third, I insist that all items in a given list be complete sentences and
>end with a period or be fragments and end without a period. No mixing
>allowed.
So are imperative sentences with an understood subject (eg, "Do this or risk
utter annihilation.") viewed as "complete sentences?"
From your example response
>To do ..., you should
>* Do this, then do that; if you do the other thing, ...
imperative sentences with an understood subject are, indeed, complete sentences.
But I have been in Big Blue companies where "Do this" was *not* a complete
sentense.