TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:SI Units From:Cronista -at- aol -dot- com To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com (TECHWR-L) Date:Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:14:37 EDT
Mr. Hutschenreuther:
Please be aware that there are still a few of us in the U.S. who know that we
are members of the CGPM, and were one of the signatories to the first "Treaty
of the Meter" in Paris in 1874, and to many of the international agreements
since then. I don't know how many countries are members now (I could easily
look it up if it were important), but the U.S. is still a member.
The problem you observed here is that in the last decade or so, we have a new
crop of technical writers, many of whom don't know the difference between an
Ohm and a Mho, let alone how to abbreviate Ampere. They depend on what they
call Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and spend most of their time formatting
documents. Some of them (as you noticed in one of the replies) haven't even
yet heard of the NASA disaster resulting from working with the wrong system
of units.
Nevertheless, there are still several of us who are familiar with SI units
and can work with them easily. We have obvious access to the Internet and can
look up terms like "technical abbreviations" and fill our screens with
answers. But not all Technical Writers will take the trouble (even using a
spell-checker is an alien experience). Instead, they will ask their questions
here, an embarrassment to many of us.
I just don't want you to think that all of the Technical Writers here are as
"innocent" as the ones you addressed in your message.
Cordially,
Charles Jay
Phoenix Arizona