TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MS Agent From:raj abraham <raj_jo_ash -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Peter,
You wrote:
As implemented in MS Office by MS, I agree that it
sucks. I was
referring to creative use of the technology as a
training aid. If the
technology is used properly, one can have several
characters carrying
on
a conversation, that can vary with the user's input.
I doubt the technology could do that. The MS agent
calls on sophisticated algorithms using Bayesian
Probability formulae to interpret the state of mind of
the user. Unfortunately it only has a user's sequence
of keystrokes to go by to decide that the user is
confused or at a loss as to how to proceed. This is
clearly not enough which is why the agent gets it
wrong so often.
Regards
Raj
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/