TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: RE: HTML help: HTML editors From:chasity mcwilliams <chas -at- fcs -dot- uga -dot- edu> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:47:30 -0600
I like Homesite or Dreamweaver. Mainly because both allow
really easy access to HTML. If I am impatient trying to
get the program to do something, I can just go in and code
it by hand. I also like the fact that neither does
anything strange to the code. Although, I have heard that
DreamWeaver 3 does-I haven't had a chance to play with it
though so I don't know.
chas
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:47:07 -0400 "Ward, Curtis (DBS-CLT)"
<curtis_ward -at- dbs-systems -dot- com> wrote:
> I have Front Page for quite some time. 2000 does a better
> job of NOT trashing script than previous versions. It also
> has an easy to access html view. If you need it, the site
> management functionality is fairly impressive, but works
> best with IIS.
>
> I still use mostly Notepad for ASP and pages with a great
> deal of JavaScript, however.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Curtis Ward curtis_ward -at- dbs-systems -dot- com
>
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Cheri E. Kelln
> > >
> > > Does anybody have a preference when it comes to good
> > > HTML editors?
> >
----------------------
"You're not dying, you just can't think of anything
good to do."
-Ferris B.
chasity mcwilliams
chas -at- fcs -dot- uga -dot- edu