TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
The original post was (clipped):
>> From: Gilda_Spitz -at- markham -dot- longview -dot- ca
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:56:57 -0400
>> When we provide instructions for date format, we want to say something
like
>> "mm/dd/yyyy". (Yes, I know this is American format; British and Canadian
>> format would be "dd/mm/yyyy".)
>>
>> Would you use upper or lower case?
>>
>> Gilda Spitz
>> Manager of Documentation
>> Longview Solutions Inc.
Then we had the date format summary:
>> From: Gilda_Spitz -at- markham -dot- longview -dot- ca
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:24:51 -0400
>> The unanimous choice of tech writers who responded to my question was :
>> mm/dd/yyyy in lower case.
There's more to this topic.
.
The original question concerned "when we provide instructions for date
format".
If this concerns the reader entering data into a field, then what the field
is called
(on the screen) could be a factor. I certainly wouldn't use upper-case if
the field
label was literally "mm/dd/yyyy".
Beyond that, if what you are doing is providing a syntactical representation
of
acceptable user input, one of course must work with what the system
engineers
have built. In the US, that is likely to be "mm/dd/yyyy". Lower-case is
preferable
(because more general).
However, in some cases (usually when writing about how a result will be
presented),
case (and the number of characters used in a field) ARE significant. In such
situations,
you may be explaining that "MM/dd/yyyy" produces "MA" for March, instead of
"03".
Furthermore, for writers in the Telecom industry, and probably others, the
delimiter
is a dash, not a slash. I don't have the exact standard to hand; I'm fairly
sure that it
is CCITT. In small print, or in low resolutions (e.g. onscreen) , a slash
can be
confused with the number "1". Dashes are much clearer.
If one was concerned about non-US audiences, the rest of the planet finds
the
top-down order of "yyyy-mm-dd" more familiar (and logical). But, that may
not
be what the boffins built.
As the saying goes, the devil is in the details.
Christopher Knight, Technical Communicator
E-mail: cknight -at- attcanada -dot- ca
Phone: (604) 877-0074