TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I get very annoyed with the over-use of acronyms in IT
IT isn't the only area. TW <grin> are as much at fault. I was talking with
my hubby the other day and I mentioned talking to an SME. He said "what?"
And so I explained it to him. He couldn't believe we had an acronym for
that. "Why don't you just say expert? Isn't is clear that you'd only ask an
expert in the field you inquiring about? And 'expert' is fewer syllables
than 'SME'! Jeesh!" Needless to say he went on about how tech writers are
merely expanding the acronym universe. And after I thought about it, he
sounded kinda right. Why do we need an acronym for expert? And the acronym
is one that only other tech writers usually understand. Why make it more
convoluted?
Christi Carew
Product Marketing Documentation Specialist
ccarew -at- rangestar -dot- com
(As usual, I apologize for the long sig. It is automatically attached to all
outgoing mail.)
IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
CALL FOR PAPERS OPEN UNTIL MARCH 15. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.