TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
It just occurred to me....we're not using pseudotags, we're coding in XML!
Jo Byrd
Paul Sinasohn wrote:
> see below for mine... but first....
>
> >TGREER wrote:
> > Couple of favourites:
> > <rant> </rant>
> > <on soapbox> </on soapbox>
>
> Tasha, I've seen that last one without the 'on'....
>
> I often use: <g,d&rlh> which is <grin, duck, and run like hell>
>
> and <BEG> which is <Big Evil Grin>......those two don't require formal closing
> tags (they are closers, themselves, actually)
>
> Another favorite is </lurk> <lurk> .... but you have to use it in that order
> (backwards) or it doesn't make sense.
>
> And my sister uses <blonde> </blonde> sometimes, even though she's a redhead.
IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
CALL FOR PAPERS OPEN UNTIL MARCH 15. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
