RE: Catbert and employee performance reviews

[Janet Valade <janetv -at- systech -dot- com>]

I think you should be as precise as possible. Surely they want accuracy. For
example,

Time Management.  4.9993241
Initiative.  4.8999999
Priority Setting. 4.92312345
Etc.

If you think Attitude should be low, you could go with 4.61123123. Of
course, if the Attitude being measured was Amazement or Amusement, the score
might be 4.99999999.

Janet

Janet Valade
Technical Writer
Systech Corporation, San Diego, CA
mailto:janetv -at- systech -dot- com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mike Buckler [SMTP:mbuckler -at- opera -dot- iinet -dot- net -dot- au]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 28, 2001 6:41 AM
> To:	TECHWR-L
> Subject:	Catbert and employee performance reviews
> 
> Today I was handed the following form:
> 
> Employee Performance Review
> Please rate the following areas on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the
> highest.
> 
> ------------
> Time Management
> Initiative
	...
> Sense of urgency
> Flexibility
> -------------
> 
> My initial reaction was to put down "5" in response to these
> meaningless statements, but that would indicate an "attitude" of less
> than "5", oh dear.
> 
> 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems 
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and 
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe.  http://ieeepcs.org/2001/

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit 
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.