TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
OK, everyone else on the list is saying "This is really inappropriate, and
after I've weighed in, we really should drop the subject." So I can't resist
doing the same thing. <vbg>
<Christine -dot- Anameier -at- seagate -dot- com> wrote in message news:100147 -at- techwr-l -dot- -dot- -dot-
>
>
>
> Janice Gelb recast Geoff Hart's excerpt...
> > <snip>
> > if the writer is blaming Word, sit down with them and watch them
> > write--assuming they'll let you do this. Maybe they're simply
> > using the software the wrong way, and observing them will reveal
> > this so you can explain the problem and help them to solve it.
> > </snip>
>
> ....this way:
> > "You may want to sit down and watch how a writer blaming Word
> > is using the product -- assuming that's acceptable. Perhaps
> > the software is being used incorrectly and you can explain the
> > the problem and help solve it."
<snip>
> My overall objection to the rewrite is this: it blurs the picture.
>
> The original paragraph is about coaching a frustrated writer. The original
> keeps that writer in your mind's eye, mentioning (___insert pronoun of
> choice here___) seven times. The rewrite virtually erases the writer from
> the picture, takes the concepts out of logical order, introduces vagueness
> and passive voice, all to avoid using the singular "they." In my opinion,
> this is not an improvement.
>
> I'm not trying to cast aspersions on Janice's writing. I think at least
> some of these pitfalls are unavoidable if you recast this paragraph to
> avoid the singular "they." I seriously doubt that I could do any better.
In
> previous posts I advocated recasting sentences to avoid the pronoun, but
in
> this case, the writing suffers for it. IMO, the singular "they" is a small
> price to pay for the clarity and directness of Geoff's original paragraph.
I agree with Christine that the rewrite "blurs the picture" for all the
reasons she cites. And I'm not adamently opposed to a singular "they"
(although I try hard to avoid it). But I think a much simpler rewrite
eliminates the problem without blurring the picture:
"If _writers are_ blaming Word, sit down with them... Maybe they're simply
using the software the wrong way, and observing them..."
I'll bet that 90% of the time you can avoid a singular they/them by making
its antecedent noun plural. "Everyone is entitled to his/her/their opinion"
becomes "We're all entitled to our opinions." And this is mine. <g>
Much earlier in this thread, Bryan Westbrook asked:
> BTW, does anybody know the quote, "The problem with common [?] is that
it's
> just so common."? I tried to find it, but I didn't have any luck.
I can't recall the source, but the missing word [?] is "sense."
Happy weekend, all!
Richard
------
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Voyant Technologies, Inc.
richard -dot- combs -at- voyanttech -dot- com
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs -at- free-market -dot- net
303-777-0436
------
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27. http://www.pdfconference.com.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.