RE: Certification, take II?

Subject: RE: Certification, take II?
From: david -dot- locke -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:50:20 -0500

Not to be contrary, but certification should mean that we are better writers
than the people who hire us. This has nothing to do with what high schools
or colleges produce.

Certification is only one way to increase our professionalism. It is a
defensive measure. A more offensive means is to push forward with the body
of knowledge that we would need to know. Here we are again left with the STC
and a few other granting organizations. And, regardless of where you stand
on the conference issue, the STC has improved its research orientation over
the years. What research do we need that is outside that need by other
professions?

At some point our profession will have to be grounded in something more than
we are better writers than our peers.

David



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27. http://www.pdfconference.com.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Top ten dumb comment - long
Next by Author: RE: Making them read the documentation
Previous by Thread: Re: Certification, take II?
Next by Thread: RE: Certification, take II?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads