TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Rule about not using possessive? (Take III, and out)
Subject:Re: Rule about not using possessive? (Take III, and out) From:"Richard G. Combs" <richard -dot- combs -at- voyanttech -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:36:00 -0600
In response to Bruce Byfield's commie-pinko relativism <g>, Geoff Hart
wrote, in part:
<snip> I don't pretend that grammar is akin to the laws of nature; rather,
it
> reflects the principles that underlie prevailing usage. </snip>
I'd go further and say that at least some of the rules of grammar *are* laws
of nature; when you violate them, you contradict reality. In fact, that's
*why* violating them obscures meaning.
Take, for instance, the matter of subject-verb number agreement. Saying "She
are..." or "They is..." doesn't just ignore an arbitrary preference of the
bourgeousie. It rejects Aristotle's law of identity; the subject of your
communication cannot be *both* an individual and a group at the same time.
[Note: Please don't bring up side issues such as the British convention of
using a plural verb when the subject is a company or corporation. These
involve the boundary issue of when a subject changes from singular to
plural, or vice versa. It doesn't change the principle; once you decide that
a subject *is* singular, you cannot logically treat it as *simultaneously*
plural.]
Now, mind you, I can imagine the language evolving to the point where we no
longer distinguish between singular and plural verb forms. However, _until
that happens_, subject-verb agreement is *not* just a matter of style and is
*not* subject to majority vote.
"It's my opinion and it's very true."
Richard
------
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Voyant Technologies, Inc.
richard -dot- combs -at- voyanttech -dot- com
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs -at- free-market -dot- net
303-777-0436
------
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, July 15-18 in Washington, DC
The Help Technology Conference, August 21-24 in Boston, MA
Details and online registration at http://www.SolutionsEvents.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.