RE: Baiting for the single source rant (getting long)

Subject: RE: Baiting for the single source rant (getting long)
From: "Douglas S. Bailey (AL)" <dbailey -at- commandalkon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:00:18 -0500

> I can always tell when a manual has been single-sourced,

Except when you can't tell the difference. I'm the same way with
lesbians...I can always tell if a woman is one, except for those women who
don't fit the stereotype (short hair, pants, masculine traits and
preferences, etc.)

You can tell a document has been single-sourced only if it was poorly done.
A properly single-sourced document will be indistinguishable from "standard"
documents. And there goes your arguement, out the window.

--Doug


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: http://www.axialinfo.com http://www.miramo.com +++

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Baiting for the single source rant (getting long): From: Swallow, William

Previous by Author: RE: Baiting for the single source rant
Next by Author: Discussing new News
Previous by Thread: RE: Baiting for the single source rant (getting long)
Next by Thread: Single Sores


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads