TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
How Long Before Common Usage Becomes the Rule? (was: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Subject:How Long Before Common Usage Becomes the Rule? (was: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question From:"Lin Sims" <linda -dot- sims -at- verizon -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:32:34 -0400
This question is more tongue-in-cheek than anything else, but I'm
genuinely curious about it.
English-speaking (and writing) people have been happily using
"they" as the indefinite singular pronoun since at least the time of
Shakespeare (400+ years now!). How long does a "common
usage" have to be used before it becomes grammatically correct?
The same question could also apply to splitting infinitives and
ending sentences with prepositions, both of which were
grammatical constructions for hundreds of years until those
Latinate prescriptivists got their hands on the grammar books.
Then all of a sudden they weren't all right anymore (amazing how
fast THAT change took), and now they're once more being
accepted, if grudgingly, by the newest generation of prescriptivists.
There are probably dozens of other examples waiting to be cited.
This doesn't mean I'm not a prescriptivist myself: I wince when I
hear "irregardless" or "as per", I've been known to tell people that
"only teeth impact", and the use of business speak such as
"prioritize" or "reimagining" has been known to drive me into
gibbering fits.
Twenty or so years from now, I expect I'll be the one complaining
about usages I consider to be ungrammatical even though by then
they'll be common--and maybe even correct.
On 9 Oct 2001, at 10:42, Brierley, Sean wrote:
For example, using "he" as a pronoun for
> things or persons of unknown gender might be correct usage but might
> also trip up and offend others. Workarounds include the he/she combo
> and grammatically incorrect use of the plural, they (which I use).
> Similarly, his becomes his/hers or theirs.
Lin Sims
Knowledge is Power.
Power Corrupts.
Study Hard. Be Evil.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe.
Attend the entire event, select a single day, or sign up for
a Saturday postconference workshop. http://ieeepcs.org/2001
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.