TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:What MS wants, MS gets. From:KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:24:13 -0500
Dear All,
Short Form
Any pointers on writing for MS, from within another
company that supplies product that might be re-sold
or that might be re-branded?
Long Form
For the past three years, I've been using FrameMaker to
produce PDFs for print or for distribution on CD. Also,
a little bit of html stuff that our resident web guy
then massages beyond recognition, so that hardly counts.
Now, we have to produce some stuff that Microsoft will
want to "assimilate" in one way or another. I'm told that,
for now, I should deal through one "point man" at our end
(i.e., not seek any direct contacts myself).
So, what should I be asking this guy to get for me?
Certainly, a requirement spec would top the list...
as would time-frames... (i.e., what MS will be doing
with my stuff will say a lot about when they'll have
to receive it... relative to my general project release
schedule).
At a guess, I'd think it likely that MS has found
itself in position to drive smaller companies perhaps
a time or two. Maybe they already have a corporate "kit"
made up to guide the lonely writers here in small-company
land. You know, guidelines, templates, commands to "use
Microsoft Manual of Style or Else", and like that. A
submissions kit, if you will. An assimilation-orientation
handbook...
I certainly don't mind learning some new stuff, and maybe
acquiring some new tools and possibly a fast new machine
to run it all ("Gee, Boss, it sez here they want it done
in XP. I think that means the entire suite AND the operating
system. I'll be needing that 2GHz Pentium 4... The 21-inch
flat-panel LCD can go over here..." :-)
However, I also know what big companies are like, such
that there might be a marvelous corporate policy and
ready-made toolkit, but the division we're dealing with
might not even know it exists.
No. Really.
So, it would help if I knew what to ask for, in some
detail and with some confidence ( I can fake the latter).
Those of you who have done work for MS or for companies
supplying/partnering with Microsoft in the past year or
two, can you offer advice?
Also, any thoughts on overall doc procedure, since I
will still need to produce our usual docs (with much
the same content) for the rest of our customers. If
anybody has blazed the trail, I'd appreciate not having
to re-invent that wheel.
I'll summarize for the list.
Thank you.
/kevin
Kevin McLauchlan
Chrysalis-ITS, Inc., Ottawa, Canada
kmclauchlan-at-chrysalis-dash-eye-tee-ess-dot-com
Opinions - free. Supporting arguments - standard rates
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.