RE: the ultimate controversial post?

Subject: RE: the ultimate controversial post?
From: Wade Courtney <wade -dot- courtney -at- nocpulse -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 06:16:01 -0800

All-

Ok, it was a joke. I didn't realize that when I sent my earlier post.
I guess my 6 years of junior college has failed me.=(

My apologies if I offended anyone with my previous email.

Regards,

The Village Idiot.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hudson
To: TECHWR-L
Sent: 11/5/01 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: the ultimate controversial post?

This has to be one of the best threads I have read in a long time. Sums
it
all up perfectly. All you missed out was phrases like:


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Be a published author! iUniverse gives you: a high-quality paperback, a
custom cover design, and distribution to 25,00 retailers. Join our almost
10,000 published authors today. http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: the ultimate controversial post?
Next by Author: RE: "Turn on the radio?"
Previous by Thread: Re: the ultimate controversial post?
Next by Thread: Style guides - doc standards vs processes (WAS: bad leadership an d tech writing)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads