RE: "firing" players from lobby into game

Subject: RE: "firing" players from lobby into game
From: "Pete Sanborn" <psanborn2 -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:43:30 -0500

I concur with Darren. The phraseology is atypical usage and very unclear
what the developer intended. The phrasing needs to be changed so the
meaning is more clear.

Regards,
Pete Sanborn

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-81537 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-81537 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Darren
Barefoot
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:31 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: "firing" players from lobby into game


Having written for games and, to my shame, played a lifetime's worth of
them, I feel confident in offering my two cents worth: That's not a phrase
that is particularly common in that context. Developers sometimes talk a lot
about "firing off an event" in the program, but this is mostly
code-monkey-speak. The most common usage I've encountered is "join" as in,
"to join a game."

I would suggest rephrasing it as: "The game launches and all of the players
who were in the lobby join it" or "the game launches with all of the players
who met in the lobby joining" or "All of the players who met in the lobby
join the game as it's launched" or something like that. Hope that helps.
Thanks. DB.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Carnall [mailto:jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com]
> Sent: 19 November 2001 14:20
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: "firing" players from lobby into game
>
>
> Input requested!
>
> In the Javadoc of a games program, the developer wrote that
> the code "fires the players who met in the lobby into the
> game". I understand what he means, but I think it sounds like
> we're treating them like human cannonballs! I googled on the
> expression, but the results were (I felt) inconclusive. Is
> this a standard phrase? (The developer says yes, but as his
> experience is primarily with this company, he might be
> reporting intracompany jargon as
> standard...)
>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: "firing" players from lobby into game: From: Darren Barefoot

Previous by Author: RE: Necessity of Doc Plans for a Single Chapter or Section
Next by Author: RE: entering tech writer field
Previous by Thread: RE: "firing" players from lobby into game
Next by Thread: Re: entering the tech writer field


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads