Ethics and Job-Hunting

Subject: Ethics and Job-Hunting
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:23:21 -0800

With so many people losing jobs and everyone else worried about keeping them, I'm curious: are there any types of tech-writing jobs that people wouldn't take?

Off the top of my head, I wouldn't take tech-writing or marketing jobs in the following areas:

- pornography: So far as I'm concerned, not only the viewed, but also the viewer are being exploited. Both are generally being manipulated by their needs. It's an industry that takes advantage of people where they're most vulnerable. But my overall impression is one of immense bad taste.

- gambling: Another area that exploits people where they're vulnerable.

- weapons: I almost wrote "defence," but then I thought that I would have no trouble writing for medical software that was used in war, or even documenting neutral hardware, such as rust detectors that might save lives. But, while not a pacifist on a person-to-person level, I don't like the thought of my work helping to kill.

- snooper ware: I'm thinking here of software that collects information on people, whether in e-commerce or in programs like the FBI's Carnivore. In the wrong hands (and virtually everybody's hands are the wrong ones, so far as I'm concerned), this information can be easily abused, and violate privacy.

Probably, there are people whose reaction to this list is simply: "Good. That's one less competitor." And, probably, too, these reservations don't help career building. But, then, I don't really care much about a career as opposed to making a living. Anything you build over the years can be torn apart in days by enemies, bad luck, or the government anyway. I'd rather live with myself. Besides, I've had the chance to work for both gambling and snooper ware companies, and my distaste was so strong that I would have done a poor job if I had tried to ignore it.

Other people, of course, might feel differently about these areas. Fair enough. I'm not trying to convert anyone to my viewpoint, much less start a debate about side issues such as whether these areas can be judged objectively wrong. I'm only delineating my personal limits.

But enough about me. Does anyone else have areas that they would have scruples about?

--
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com

"Humpty Dumpty was pushed: head over heels all over the wall,
Humpty Dumpty was pushed: nobody noticed at all,
And all the king's horses and all the king's men
Gathered round Humpty and kicked him again;
And they called for a priest and a couple of friends,
And they all stood around and chanted, Amen."
-Tommy Sands, "Humpty Dumpty Was Pushed




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Learning quickly
Next by Author: Re: Ethics and Job-Hunting
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question--amen Fred
Next by Thread: Re: Ethics and Job-Hunting


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads