RE: Network Security Article Clarification

Subject: RE: Network Security Article Clarification
From: Marguerite Krupp <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:41:58 -0500

Actually, Andrew, as one who is dealing with the same kind of network
security issues, I do appreciate both your article and the clarification.

Thanks for helping us get a handle on a particularly complex technology.

Marguerite

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Technical Writer Questions
Next by Author: RE: Fatal and unused - full text
Previous by Thread: Network Security Article Clarification
Next by Thread: Re: Network Security Article Clarification


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads