TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: When the thesaurus attacks... From:"M Rassmussen" <mrassmussen -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:11:06
Thanks for the responses. I should add that Co-Worker A and I are on very
good terms, but we don't always agree with each other's editorial decisions.
In this case, she thinks I'm being too nitpicky about her choice of words.
(For those coming in late: "invoke" and "relocate.") I told her I'd get
some feedback, and she agreed to change the words (and several other
hoity-toity ones) if the majority thought it was a good idea.
My argument is that the training package's audience is skilled but not
necessarily sophisticated. They're likely not people who sat through a
three-hour class on SAT or GRE vocabulary, and while I'm sure they could
infer the meaning of "invoke" from the sentence's context, I think it's bad
style to put the user in the position of running for a dictionary.
I asked my 19-year-old cousin, who isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer,
if she knew what "invoke" meant, and she had no clue. If even one person
isn't familiar with the word, I think it's reason enough to use a word that
everyone knows (e.g., "start," "run," or "open"), if at all possible. God
knows, it would be that one person not familiar with the definition who
pokes out an eye and sues the company: "But I thought 'invoke' meant to
stick a sharp object in my cornea."
Keep it simple, shithead. That's what my News Editing prof always said.
(Imagine a West Virginia native who looks Amish and curses a blue streak.)
I was a journalism major, which, quite frankly, meant I learned to write for
the lowest common denominator (i.e., readers of "The NY Post"). Unless one
is writing a paper on Chromatin Remodeling in Oligodendrocyte Development, I
think it's fair to keep the fancy, five-syllable words to a minimum.
I guess I answered my own question, didn't I? Oops.
-Michelle
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.