TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Seriously OT and not allowed by Eric - usage rant?
Subject:Re: Seriously OT and not allowed by Eric - usage rant? From:"Donna Melton" <donna -at- emelton -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:41:56 -0800
<<I can't see a consistent use in it of italicizing a word or putting it in
quotations.>>
Regardless of one's opinion of style manuals--specific or general--and
adherence to those manuals, the Microsoft Manual of Style does tell you when
to italicize or use quotation marks by referring you to another manual. On
page vii of the second edition (1998):
*Other standard reference works*
The following reference materials are the authorities for issues not covered
in this guide:
* American Heritage Dictionary . . .
* Chicago Manual of Style, 14th ed. . . . (no shortage here of suggestions
for italicizing and quoting)
* Harbrace College Handbook . . .
* Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary . . .
* Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design . . .
Although Microsoft claims on the cover of the Manual: "The standard
reference for techinical writers, editors, journalists, and others" the
introduction says:
"This guide is to help Microsoft writers and editors maintain consistency
within and across products. It is not a set of rules. It does provide
guidelines that have been discussed and reviewed by experienced writers and
editors across the company."
Maintain consistency . . . not a set of rules . . . does provide guidelines.
Doesn't sound like a proclamation of style domination to me. As always,
anything that helps writers to avoid confusing their readers can be a useful
tool, especially, as in Microsoft's case, where many people use multiple
products from the same company.
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.