TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: What is the maturity level of your publication process?
Subject:Re: What is the maturity level of your publication process? From:Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:32:29 -0800 (PST)
"Yigal Rahamim" wrote...
> Do you ever find yourself in any of these situations: deadlines are
> routinely missed, original schedules become impossible, plans that are
> written are ignored, project management is basically unknown, and
writers
> work deep into the night to meet deadlines.
...because the writers put off all the "real work" until the 11th hour,
because they spent the first 11 hours maturing their processes (and
writing nothing).
> Following the quiz you can read an article, contributed by JoAnn Hackos,
on
> the tools needed
> to advance your organization to the next level of process maturity.
Ohhhhh, I really hate this type of "process maturity" nonsense. It has to
be the most utterly detrimental and destructive "theory" ever introduced
to corporations. Not because the theories are inherently bad...the
theories are fine. Its the zealots who become so enamored with the
theories, that they never do a lick of real work.
I've rescued more companies from "process freaks" then I care to count.
Each time the story is the same. Vainglorious writers obsessed with
building a well-oiled documentation machine that they have no time to do
their real job - produce documents.
The quiz this firm offers is so skewed and meaningless. Basically, unless
you do things their way (which is needlessly complicated) you're a "bad"
organization.
Which is ultimately the prime failing of most of Jo Anne Hackos books.
They contain some good ideas that if you ever tried to implement them all
in the real world, you would quickly reduce pubs department into a
bureaucratic quagmire.
Andrew Plato
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.