Re: "baseline"

Subject: Re: "baseline"
From: "Douglas S. Bailey (AL)" <dbailey -at- commandalkon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:55:52 -0600

> tested), expressed as "We need to baseline the existing DDL, and then run
> periodic exports throughout the development process for comparison."

I prefer "benchmark" over "baseline", at least in this example.

--Doug





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Users vs. usage
Next by Author: RE: Robohelp and version control
Previous by Thread: "baseline"
Next by Thread: Re: techwr-l digest: December 26, 2001


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads