Re: Should vs. Will, Must and Can

Subject: Re: Should vs. Will, Must and Can
From: Sandy Harris <sandy -at- storm -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 12:40:28 -0500

There's an RFC describing how these terms are to be used in Internet Drafts
and RFCs:

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt

For any document about Internet networking, I'd follow that and list it
in my references section.

For other audiences and topics, it might be completely innappropriate.

For example, Alan -dot- Miller -at- prometric -dot- com wrote:

> In the nuclear industry (both Navy and commercial), "should" is defined to
> mean "shall" or "must." Thus removing all confusion.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sponsored by eHelp Corporation, makers of RoboHelp - the industry standard
in Help authoring. Download a trial version today or get special savings when
you buy the RoboHelp 2002 Holiday Edition. Visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can: From: Alan . Miller

Previous by Author: Re: Software opinions needed
Next by Author: Re: Alternate name
Previous by Thread: RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can
Next by Thread: Using a gerund phrase for procedure topic titles? (Take II)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads