TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Round #4263 with the Client From Hell From:"Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 8 Jan 2002 05:55:35 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Dick Margulis wrote:
> However, there is another school of thought that says the customer is
> not always right, and that Clients From Hell can be so disruptive to
> your business, so demoralizing to your employees, and so expensive to
> service, that the best course of action is to dump them
> unceremoniously. If you can collect a few bucks in court in the
> process, so much the better. The basis of this position is that caving
> to bullies, like voting, only encourages the bastards.
I find the connection between this point--well-taken, BTW--
and the need for business classes to be most interesting.
When I first started as a technical writer, I had one of
these clients from hell (I was contracting while looking
for a full-time position). After the third iteration of
- "Our style calls for eliminating all articles"
- "This sounds really stilted without articles. Why did you do
that, and how long to fix it?"
- "We have a new style guideline calling for omitting all
articles" (Really--I couldn't make that up.)
I finally got the darn book in. Per the contract, I was
supposed to show up for a round-table review, then
make the needed corrections, then resubmit.
They told me when the review was about 24 hours before
it started...six months after the initial submission.
By this time, of course, I had a fulltime job, and my
boss really wouldn't have supported giving me a day
off to wrapup contract work. I told them I couldn't make
it to the scheduled time, and suggested that perhaps
with more than 24 hours notice, I might be able to be
more accommodating. My CFH hung up on me.
I was plagued by guilt over that for years....no kidding.
I was so thoroughly in the "customer is always right"
mindset that I really didn't "get it" that the customer
could be just plain wrong. Furthermore, I had so little
business experience that I didn't realize that
contracts are broken or renegotiated every day, that
it's impossible to make some people happy (and worthless
to try), and that a failed vendor/client relationship
doesn't reflect on the vendor necessarily (unless there's
a pattern).
Based on my experience, real world business experience/
exposure is a key component of a complete tech writer
education. Business needs drive everything--or they
should.
Eric
ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.