Indexing Entry

Subject: Indexing Entry
From: JRessler -at- ewa-denver -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:18:29 -0700

This will be a "from the hip" opinion, so take it for what it is worth.

I try desperately not to become completely conventional. To me, in the
case of making multiple entries vs. an entry with subentries, I would
choose to make multiple entries. Clearly this is not a problem that
occurs all the time. There is something to be said for consistancy, but
there is also something to be said for an unconventional approach.

Saddle up and make the decision, if you were the user, would you look up
entry, entries, or both? I would make two separate entries in this
case...why...cause it is not going to hurt anything, but it will help. I
suppose there is also the dictionary phrase (See Also XXXX).

JR

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: Business issues, documentation....hows and whys
Previous by Thread: RE: The demise of Forefront and (Future of Help 2. )
Next by Thread: tables in Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads