Re: Anyone familiar with "aspforums"?

Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with "aspforums"?
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:23:09 -0500

Steven Owens wrote:

But what bugs me is that assumed
>causal relationship - "because it is freeware there is no support
>available." In fact, the lack of support is probably not at all
>related to the fact that it's free software. Now I'm afraid I have to
>go off on a rant (not directed at you personally, of course) about the
>myth of technical support being available (let alone better) for
>commercial software.

Not taking it as directed at me. And I agree with you. In the case of aspforums, though, they are upfront about announcing that they are not offering support for it. They do provide a discussion forum, but nobody with expertise participates.



[much snipped]
>
> Finally with the source available, somebody who knows programming
>can crack open the code and figure out what's going on if there's a
>bug in mission-critical software. This is not always a "last resort",
>either, sometimes it's the *first* thing I check! And while having to
>publish the source doesn't guarantee cleaner and more understandable
>code, it certainly encourages it.
>

Actually, the code is so clean and readable that I am reasonably certain there are no bugs to fix. It is well documented internally, and the user documentation provided on the site is more thorough than most. I assumed from the beginning that the problem is something I'm doing wrong, and I was just looking for someone to help me figure out what it is. If I thought the software were buggy, I would have continued to seek out more options.


> If you're interested in finding some forum software for your
>site, I suggest you surf over to http://thinkofit.com/webconf/index.htm
>read up on the different options.

I'm pretty sure that's where I found this one. It really does meet all my requirements, once I get it implemented right. And all of the other packages I looked at--whether commercial or free software--left something to be desired: wrong platform, inflexible options, beta release, requirement for visible branding and link to their site, ...

Anyway, Steve, thanks for your comments.

Dick

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: doing graphics when you're not an artist
Next by Author: RE: job interview question: ethical issues about portfolio
Previous by Thread: Re: Anyone familiar with "aspforums"?
Next by Thread: RE: Bug Tracking Software


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads