TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: [Re: Lingua Franca Today] From:Hannah <to -dot- hannah -at- usa -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:16 Jan 2002 18:40:58 EST
Stan Schwartz <stanz -at- cam -dot- org> wrote:
> <andrew's original quotes snipped for space>
>
> ...
>
> >Andrew Plato
>
> Andrew,
> I don't understand something. What's the difference? 'Geek speek'
> won't affect the reader's attention adversely but 'flowery language'
> will? I see some similarity here in the argument. You appearto me to
> be defending both sides of the argument. What has changed in that
> time?
> s
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Stan,
Not to speak for Andrew (he does a fine job all by his lonesome), but I see a
big difference between the two. The 'Geek speek' mentioned is directed at
educating an audience. I would assume that means using terms and working their
definitions into the content in some way, shape, or form that enables them to
understand the subject and learn the new term (and further empower the person
to better understand a certain aspect of their field). 'Flowery language' will
not (directly) assist the reader in their field. All it will do, after it
distracts them and makes them try to decipher its meaning as it is not
generally used with contextual explainations, is give them flowery vocabulary.
I see this as a matter of whether or not the benefit of including the
unfamiliar term will outweigh the negatives. Personally, I would see 'Geek
speek' as more of a benefit than the negative of making the reader learn. I
would also make sure the terms used are clearly explained in the context so
the reader would not have to look anything up. This is usually easy to do in
technical documents. I would see 'Flowery language' as providing no benefit to
the reader, probably would cause the reader to look up the word (whether it be
in a side bar or wherever), and not easily worked into a technical document's
context.
hannah Bissell
to -dot- hannah -at- usa -dot- net
____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.