RE: A cautionary tale: Portfolio Assessment

Subject: RE: A cautionary tale: Portfolio Assessment
From: Marguerite Krupp <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:38:49 -0500

Kevin asks:
<snip>
Is it a common practice to include in your documents
(somewhere in frontmatter, I assume) what tools were
used?
</snip>

If this info is included at all, it's generally in a colophon, at the back
of the book or in an "easter egg" in the online docs. I've seen a colophon
only at one job; they also included thanks to the guy who faithfully
delivered the pizzas.

Marguerite

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Repeated cautions: necessary or redundant?
Next by Author: RE: Unknown abbreviation...
Previous by Thread: Re: A cautionary tale: Portfolio Assessment
Next by Thread: RE: A cautionary tale: Portfolio Assessment


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads