TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Online fonts and sizes -- more From:Stan Schwartz <stanz -at- cam -dot- org> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:13:22 -0500
This is just a tad more on this subject. I have some time to call
attention to one of the chinks in this study.
Have another look at the samples. Notice that each of the typefaces
changes to another face as it increases in size. Comic in 10 pt. is a
different typeface in 12 pt. and again another one in 14 pt. The same
goes for all of the fonts (sizes) in all of the faces. The families
do not contain the same faces at different sizes. They change with
the size. Ergo, they shouldn't be compared. A type series is the same
face at different sizes.
To borrow an analogy, at 10 pt. you are comparing apples and oranges.
At 12 pt. pears and banannas are being compared. At 14 pt. the apples
and oranges have become melons and squash but they are still being
called apples and oranges.
In effect, by increasing the screen size for each of the faces, the
resolution is increased for the larger sizes to afford greater detail
to render the face more faithfully onscreen. A better study would
take all of the faces in whatever sizes are desired, mix em up,
assign each an arbitrary number and compare all of them for what they
are. The results would be no surprise. Big detailed type is... (pick
any positive attribute description) than small low-res type.
Factors that affect readability, usability, and legibility are
interrelated and careful experiments must be designed taking this
into account before any conclusions can be drawn as to their
effectiveness. Typographic proficiency is a balancing act with all
these factors of size and space. None can be taken in isolation.
Above is only one of many traits that were extracted by SURL for
examination in ignorance of the interplay of the individual factors
under test.
s
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.