RE: Got Process?

[Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com>]

Steve Hudson wrote...

> So Andrew never has any idea of what his clients are saying??? Do you
> SERIOUSLY suggest we cannot assess the inputs to our dept? What the hell
> are we doing in the position then.

So you have an automated process that requires no intelligence whatsoever
that can evaluate the relevance, accuracy, etc. of information. It works
flawlessly without any human intervention. You can hire a llama to do the
work and he consistently produces perfect output. 

Wow - that's amazing. Why aren't you a multi-billionare? 

> Assess the inputs for relevant infrormation to the task at hand, if not
> enough, request more, specifing desired content.

And why do you need a "process" to do that? Wouldn't just good old
intelligence do the exact same thing? 

I think  what you call a "process" I call "common sense." 

Andrew Plato 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you 
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of 
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit 
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.