Re: Dangling Modifiers
I'm not prepared to be a purist and roll the language back to
pre-Christian Anglo-Saxon times just to squeeze out all usages
people don't like because they require some thought. I feel free
to end a sentence in a preposition when I'm just talking among
people. I don't so much when I'm communicating formally, because
people expect us to aim higher when we do. You may see it as
artificial; I see it as the reason I'm employed.
Doesn't the intended audience of the document in question come
into play here?
If the writing is structured in a way that it requires extra thought
from the reader to reconstruct a sentence from the "proper" usage
into a form that they can readily digest, can it not be better to
sometimes stray from rigid grammatical rules for the sake of
readability?
cheers,
Richard
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
RE: Dangling Modifiers: From: Dana Worley
Re: Dangling Modifiers: From: Michael Feimster
Re: Dangling Modifiers: From: Firetail Documentation
Re: Dangling Modifiers: From: Bruce Byfield
Re: Dangling Modifiers: From: Firetail Documentation
Previous by Author:
Adding Background Color to a GIF
Next by Author:
Terminology
Previous by Thread:
Re: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Thread:
Re: Dangling Modifiers
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads