TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Can a grammar checker do this From:"Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:39:44 -0500
"David Downing" wrote:
>I ordinarily shun grammar checkers (for all the reasons many other folks
>shun them) but there is one error I was thinking they might help me find
>-- the typo which is itself a real word and thus goes unnoticed by the
>spell checker. ("Your bank may refuse to honor your check, even is you
>have enough money in your account.")
Word's grammar checker actually finds this sort of thing quite handily. In fact it finds a good number of errors quite handily. The principal problem with it is that people who have a weak grasp of English grammar assume the grammar checker is always correct. It isn't, but you know that.
I recall that long before anybody
>even thought of word processors, a linguist* had the idea of using a
>computer to assess the grammatical correctness of a sentence by
>searching for it a database of pre-existing published writing of all
>kinds. The fewer instances of the sentence in the database, the more
>likely it was to be grammatically incorrect.
I'd place the likelihood that this was Noam Chomsky at around 0.001 percent. But I could be wrong.
Turns out this isn't a
>reliable measure of grammatical correctness**, but maybe you could use a
>variation of it to at least show you strings of two or three words that
>occur very rarely, and are thus suspect.
Actually you may be misremembering the whole thing (at least I hope you are). One of Chomsky's early observations was that any child can produce a huge number of grammatical utterances in his or her native language that have never been spoken before.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.