Re: web animation
On Thursday 14 March 2002 06:52 am, SteveFJong -at- aol -dot- com wrote:
> To me, the general response "just say no" to animation (and sound) on a Web
> site appears reactionary.
Some might refer to it as a desire to concede that a lot of folks have a slow
connection. I have a high speed connection, but still some animations and
sounds slow the loading to a crawl. I refuse to wait for that idiocy to
download. How long owuld you wait for the "priviledge" of watching a
commercial?
Not to mention there are accesibility issues, etc..
I think the real answer is "it's a bigger issue than 'are pictures good'". Learn the technology and learn to be a web developer before trying to, well, develop for the web. ;)
Just think if your engineers tried to write documentation -- and they asked some "simple" question. You'll tell them to go learn about being a tech writer before trying to do tech writing. Different choices have different implications, and you need to know what they are so you can figure out if your audience is compatible with your idea and the technology used to produce it.
-Katie
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check it out! Get some cool freebies when you buy RoboHelp! You'll receive
SnagIt screen capture software and a 10% discount voucher for RoboHelp
Consulting. This special offers expires March 29, 2002.
www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
RE: web animation: From: SteveFJong
Re: web animation: From: peter
Previous by Author:
Re: Google response
Next by Author:
Re: Link text in HTML help systems
Previous by Thread:
Re: web animation
Next by Thread:
RE: web animation
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads