TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Pros and Cons of HTML tools From:Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- jci -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:35:25 -0500
Until FP2000, Front Page was something best left at the bottom of the
toilet bowl. (I was going to quote from my FP97 certificate, but I can't
seem to find it at the moment. When we first started using it here, they
sent a batch of us to school on it.) I tried it for a while, then quit and
went back to hand coding the pages. Oddly, enough, it was *faster* to do it
that way than use FP97. Go figure.
Now, the list of gripes I have with FP is similar to the list of gripes I
have with *all* WYSIWYG HTML editors. I still have yet to see anyone build
a page of any degree of complexity with one of those tools that actually
contains completely valid HTML (as opposed to HTML that will work in a
browser, the two concepts *are* different). I passed an FP2002 developed
page through the validator and got 6 errors, which means it's probably no
worse than the other tools. MS has certainly come a long way from the first
version. Among the web professionals I know, FP is still considered a
hallmark of amateurism, but I suspect that it's more because of the baggage
of the past versions than it is a comment on the current one.
Does FP2002 still mangle imagemaps? (That was one of the major gripes with
the old one; when you opened an imagemap it rewrote the imagemap to the
point the original editing app couldn't recognize it anymore.) That isn't a
problem for me, because I rarely use them, but it might be for someone
else.
Best tool? BBEdit, of course. ;{>}
Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 224
Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.