RE: techwr-l digest: April 30, 2002

Subject: RE: techwr-l digest: April 30, 2002
From: "Margaret Secara" <margaret -dot- secara -at- alphather -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 08:54:21 -0700


When in that situation, I just write it the way it's supposed to work. By the time it's all released, that buggy feature will (probably) have been whipped into shape.

At least, that's the theory :)


Maggie Secara

>>> "Blount, Patricia" <PATRICIA -dot- BLOUNT -at- ca -dot- com> Wednesday, May 01, 2002 >>>

Hi,

I need the benefit of your collective experiences... as tech writers, we frequently are documenting products that are still under development, so that the documents can ship with the product, no?

OK, so what have you done when faced with a feature that is at best, "buggy". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. If you write a procedure according to the way it's supposed to work (i.e., design intention), then your book is wrong at least part of the time.

I'm wondering if the books should contain an alternative section, something like "What to do if this procedure fails to produce the desired result..."




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Study: Internet Explorer Dominates the Web
Next by Author: Re: Differentiating header info
Previous by Thread: RE: techwr-l digest: April 30, 2002
Next by Thread: Documenting a buggy feature (was RE: techwr-l digest: April 30, 2002)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads