Re: Storage of hardcopy reviews?

Subject: Re: Storage of hardcopy reviews?
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:43:40 -0400


In addition to the considerations Geoff elucidates, there are circumstances where there are regulatory concerns. If you work in a regulated industry, there may be specific rules about retention of hardcopy review documents. In the case of the FDA-regulated medical device manufacturing industry, for example, the Quality System Regulation requires that such review markups of any documents that belong to the Design History File be retained until the last device remaining in the field, anywhere in the world, is scrapped. That's a mountain of paper that has to be properly cataloged and indexed when you put a development project to bed, lemme tell ya. (This kind of regulation is Iron Mountain's bread and butter.)

Dick

"Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA> replied to Malkia Payton Jackson:
>
>You can't come up with a good answer to this question until you understand
>why you want to keep these reviews in the first place.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by May 15. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Not Writing for Translation (was RE: Re(2): Number/Figure)
Next by Author: RE: Grammar Checker
Previous by Thread: Storage of hardcopy reviews?
Next by Thread: RE: Storage of hardcopy reviews?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads