TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: instructions for a pb&j sandwhich - a little OT
Subject:RE: instructions for a pb&j sandwhich - a little OT From:kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 28 May 2002 11:33:36 -0600
Sean B. wrote;
> The core of my disagreement is this: Sean H.'s tale is amusing, not
> really informative. Is writing instructions for PB&J sandwiches, or any
> other kind of sandwich for that matter, really and truly a *difficult*
> task, for a novice writer or for those who *know* how to write
> instructions. Do instructions for making a sandwich really need to be
> preceded by a list of assumptions made by the writer?
Given the absurdity of the task, I'd say "probably." The person testing
you *knows* how to make the sandwich; it's a task you're BOTH familiar
with. And it makes it easy for the person to grade your efforts. The
object of the test is to make sure you cover all the possibilities,
present the information in a logical order, and don't skip any steps.
One of the steps is opening the jar. If you don't include that, in my
opinion you fail this particular test.
You're a pro, so the skills required are probably intuitive by now. So
such tests no doubt seem silly to you.
But I've worked with "experienced" writers who were terrible at estimating
the knowledge and skills of their audience. And I've read a lot of awful
documentation. I recently bought a watch from a major manufacturer who
provided me a sheet of instructions something like this.
1. Setting the date:
First turn the watch on, then.....
2. Setting the time:
3. Turning the watch on:
I kid you not. There was no rhyme or reason to the order of the steps, and
many steps referred to other steps found later in the doc, which needed to
be done *before* the steps I was currently working on.
Bottom line: I think these seemingly silly tests are great for reminding
us to think hard about what is and is not obvious to the reader.
Keith Cronin
__________________________
My attention span keeps getting shorter and shorter. Sometimes I even
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by May 15. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.