Re: craft vs. science
Yeah, I've got a thought. "Craft" is not a
derogatory description of technical writing or any
other activity.
Who said it was?
Well, you started the thread with a post that included the line, "Why? Because I have a process. If it were craft, I'd be King Workaround, Lord of the Makeshifts." I read that as a mild deprecation of craft. If it wasn't intended that way, I apologize to you; but I think it led to some interesting discussion in any case.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: craft vs. science, Goober
References:
Re: craft vs. science: From: Goober
Previous by Author:
Re: Popups in PDF
Next by Author:
Re: Verifying the source of a quotation
Previous by Thread:
Re: craft vs. science
Next by Thread:
Re: craft vs. science
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads