Re: SME's word

Subject: Re: SME's word
From: "Martin R. Soderstrom" <scribbler1382 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:17:34 -0400


Well, you know your environment and the people you work with better than I
do, but it seems foolhardy to me to not check your facts or get
corroboration. But then, I'm a journalism grad, and it's in my nature to
get confirmation from as many sources as possible. (I've also been burned a
few times by harried SME's with no malicious intent, but a need for me to go
away so they could meet _their_ deadline.)

-- Martin

"Sean Brierley" <sbri -at- haestad -dot- com> wrote in message news:163390 -at- techwr-l -dot- -dot- -dot-

Well, I don't have time to poll every SME and conduct research. I sorta
have to take the SME at their word--which can be tough if your doc is
open to review by SMEs with a slightly different spin, because you can
get into a situation where SMEs up the food chain start routinely
overriding and requiring changes of content already approved by SMEs
lower on the food chain.

This idea of not taking the SME's word is exactly the issue in a recent
Intercom magazine article, where a piece on the difference between
online help and printed docs revolves around some tired falsehoods about
the failure of single-sourcing--that is, should the Intercom editors
have taken the article's author at her word or should they have checked
with a SIG or other experts first?

In any event. Even though my SMEs get trumped by managers on occasion, I
still take them at their word unless it occurs to me they might be
wrong.

Sean

-----------------------------------------
Sean Brierley
Software Documentation Specialist
Haestad Methods
http://www.haestad.com
203-805-0572 (voice)
203-597-1488 (fax)



-----Original Message-----
From: Richard G. Combs [mailto:richard -dot- combs -at- voyanttech -dot- com]

Richard Pineger <no -dot- spam -dot- please -at- totalise -dot- co -dot- uk> wrote:


Obligatory techwriting tie-in: Don't take your SME's word -- especially
if
your SME has an ax to grind.





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

Buy RoboHelp Deluxe starting at only $798: you'll get RoboDemo, the hot new
software demonstration tool that's taking the Help authoring world by storm,
together with RoboHelp Office. Learn more at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Why'd that take so long?
Next by Author: Re: fake names
Previous by Thread: Re: SME's word
Next by Thread: RE: SME's word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads